Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
JAMA Pediatr ; 177(4): 439, 2023 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2308823
2.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine ; 205(1), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1927872

ABSTRACT

Introduction Reportedly, teaching at the bedside is declining over time. This purported decline has not been quantified. Quantifying bedside teaching is challenging, and we found only one study quantifying bedside teaching on a hospitalist service. We conducted a study to understand the prevalence of bedside teaching in our medical intensive care unit. Methods We conducted a single-center single-unit study in the medical intensive care unit of an academic tertiary care institution. We utilized a survey tool to assess perceived time spent on bedside teaching, quality of teaching, and total rounding time. In parallel, independent observers objectively measured time spent on rounds and on bedside teaching. Residents were asked to complete the survey once a week. Independent observers collected data daily and weekly averages were obtained. Results A total of 43 responses were collected over a 4-month period. Most respondents (73%) reported a total rounding time of either 90-120 min or greater than 120 min. Median reported bedside teaching time was 16-20 min with 16 respondents (37%) reporting less than 15 min and 27 respondents (63%) reporting 16 min or more. The amount of time spent on bedside teaching was reported as adequate or more than adequate by 77% (33) of respondents with 58% (25) reporting that bedside teaching was very or extremely effective in helping them learn. The mean census reported by the independent observers was 12.75 patients per team. Bedside teaching represented an average of 12% of total rounding time, 16.85 minutes per day. There was no correlation between the team census and the amount of bedside teaching. While total rounding time increased with increasing census, there was no decline in bedside teaching time. Discussion/Conclusion Medical education has evolved over time and has gradually incorporated informal teaching sessions, simulations, and mini lectures in addition to traditional bedside teaching. Despite the evolution in medical education, bedside teaching remains an integral component of post graduate medical education. Even though bedside teaching represented only 12% of total rounding time, medical residents perceived the time and quality of bedside teaching to be adequate. Strengths: Bedside teaching time was corroborated by independent observers and not limited to subjective perception of trainees. Limitations: This study was limited to one medical intensive care unit in an academic tertiary care hospital. This study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic which may have affected results. A small number of surveys were collected over a 4-month period. (Figure Presented).

3.
Viruses ; 14(5):883, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1871629

ABSTRACT

Seasonal IAV was responsible for an average of 12,000–52,000 deaths annually between 2010 and 2020 in the U.S. before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, with preventive measures addressing the latter respiratory infection also reducing the impact of seasonal influenza. The H7N9 hemagglutinin shows limited binding to human receptors;however, if a single amino acid mutation occurs, this would result in structural changes within the receptor binding site that allow extensive binding to human receptors present in the upper respiratory tract [15]. [...]persons born after 1968 are expected to have little or no immunity to an H2N2 virus. The impact of the waterfowl avian flyways, even in this era of extensive global airline traffic, should not be underestimated, as illustrated by the delivery of highly pathogenic Eurasian avian H5N1 virus to commercial and backyard avian flocks in multiple states currently, in 2022, resulting in culling of flocks and, of course, potential risk of transmission to humans, as noted above.

4.
Pediatr Ann ; 51(5): e180-e185, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1847430

ABSTRACT

Children account for a growing share of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections in the United States. Since the widespread availability of COVID-19 vaccine in adults, there has been an upward trend of cases in children, accounting for approximately 20% of the weekly new cases. The majority (38.3%) reported in high school students age 14 to 17 years. Children are also at risk of a postinflammatory condition, known as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, after COVID-19. In addition, infected children could transmit the virus to vulnerable adults, contributing to ongoing pandemic. We believe that children need to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and review the available evidence. [Pediatr Ann. 2022;51(5):e180-e185.].


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Child , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination
5.
Pediatr Ann ; 51(5): e178-e179, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1847429
6.
Pediatr Ann ; 51(5): e202-e205, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1847428

ABSTRACT

Pediatric patients with "once-daily" fevers are often referred to pediatric infectious disease specialists for evaluation. Often, these fevers occur at nighttime in the absence of additional symptoms and come to the caregiver's attention after a viral illness. It is crucial for caregivers and providers to be able to define and measure fever accurately when trying to ascertain the true etiology of this clinical picture. Fever education is critical in providing reassurance to parents, and fever diaries should be encouraged. In a well-appearing child without any additional symptoms, at least a percentage of these fevers can be explained by normal diurnal variation of temperature. [Pediatr Ann. 2022;51(5):e202-e205.].


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Caregivers , Child , Fever/diagnosis , Fever/etiology , Fever/therapy , Humans , Parents , Temperature
8.
Ann Med ; 53(1): 2286-2297, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1545785

ABSTRACT

The current COVID-19 global pandemic continues to impact healthcare services beyond those directly related to the management of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and disease. We reviewed the published literature to assess the pandemic impact on existing global immunization activities and how the impact may be addressed. Widespread global disruption in routine childhood immunization has impacted a majority of regions and countries, especially in the initial pandemic phases. While data indicate subsequent recovery in immunization rates, a substantial number of vulnerable people remain unvaccinated. The downstream impact may be even greater in resource-limited settings and economically poorer populations, and consequently there are growing concerns around the resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases, particularly measles. Guidance on how to address immunization deficits are available and continue to evolve, emphasizing the importance of maintaining and restoring routine immunization and necessary mass vaccination campaigns during and after pandemics. In this, collaboration between a broad range of stakeholders (governments, industry, healthcare decision-makers and frontline healthcare professionals) and clear communication and engagement with the public can help achieve these goals.Key messagesThe COVID-19 pandemic has a substantial impact on essential immunization activities.Disruption to mass vaccination campaigns increase risk of VPD resurgence.Catch-up campaigns are necessary to limit existing shortfalls in vaccine uptake.Guidance to mitigate these effects continues to evolve.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Immunization , Pandemics , Vaccination Coverage , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Public Health , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
9.
J Visc Surg ; 158(6): 537, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1414677
11.
Parameters: U.S. Army War College ; 51(3):19-38, 2021.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1399935
12.
Pediatr Ann ; 50(2): e84-e89, 2021 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1083161

ABSTRACT

Childhood cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are on the rise as the pandemic continues to rage across the globe. Most children acquire infection from an adult household member. Children may stay asymptomatic, have a pre-symptomatic stage, or present with symptoms (fever, cough, and difficulty breathing being the most common). Nearly one-third of the pediatric cases (32%) in the United States occurred in children age 15 to 17 years. Children are also at risk of a postinfectious hyperinflammatory syndrome called multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). The risk of vertical transmission is low (2%) in newborns of mothers with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is the gold standard for (SARS-CoV-2). Serology should be considered in a child with high clinical suspicion for COVID-19 when NAAT is negative and at least 2 weeks have passed since symptom onset and for assessment of MIS-C. Easy fatigability after COVID-19 infection is reported in adults; however, data in children are lacking. Implementation of early and robust containment strategies coupled with universal COVID-19 vaccination are vital to halt the spread. [Pediatr Ann. 2021;50(2):e84-e89.].


Subject(s)
COVID-19/transmission , Pediatrics , Adolescent , Asymptomatic Infections , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , United States/epidemiology
13.
Contemporary Pediatrics ; 37(7):18-20,22, 2020.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-831422

ABSTRACT

Department of Pediatrics, New York University (NYU) Winthrop Hospital, and professor of Pediatrics at NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York. Since the first report of an outbreak of respiratory disease in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS CoV2), coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has reached pandemic proportions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the following definition for MIS-C:3 * An individual aged 21 years and younger with fever for 1 or more days, laboratory evidence of inflammation, and illness requiring hospitalization with multisystem (2 or more) organ involvement (cardiac, renal, hematologic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, neurologic), AND * No alternative plausible diagnosis, AND * Evidence of current or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), serology or antigen test, or exposure to a suspected or confirmed COVID-19 case within the 4 weeks prior to the onset of symptoms. Ripha-gen and colleagues described 8 previously healthy children aged 4 to 14 years from Evelina London Children's Hospital who presented with hyperinflammatory shock and features similar to atypical Kawasaki disease (KD), KD shock syndrome (KDSS), or toxic shock syndrome (TSS) in mid-April 2020.4 Of the 8 cases, 6 were children of African-Caribbean descent, most were teenagers, and 5 were males. A series of 10 children aged 3 to 16 years (mostly teenagers) from Bergamo, Italy, presenting between February 18 and April 20, 2020, with what the authors labeled as severe Kawasaki-like disease was published in the Lancet on May 13, 2020.5 By definition, these children met the 2017 American Heart Association criteria for KD or incomplete KD with 5 or more days of fever, compatible rash, and mucous membrane findings, but the overall picture was not consistent with classic KD.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL